Differences between revisions 13 and 18 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 13 as of 2012-02-23 12:13:03
Size: 3632
Editor: vdelecroix
Comment:
Revision 18 as of 2012-02-25 12:37:29
Size: 5158
Editor: tmonteil
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 8: Line 8:
== How do I implement my language ? my tiling ? ==

There are different places to look at for examples:
 * sage.categories.examples.languages: two examples of languages. PalindromicLanguages (the language of palindromes) and UniformMonoid (the submonoid of the free monoid on {a,b} that contains as many a as b).
 * sage.categories.examples.factorial_languages: ??? (need an example)
 * sage.monoids.free_monoid: implementation of the free monoid.
 * sage.combinat.languages.*: where most implementation of languages should go.

For tilings, there is not yet examples.
Line 12: Line 22:
 * sage.categories
   * .languages: A language is a subset of A^N where A is a set called alphabet. It is naturally graded by N and the grading is called the length.
   * .factorial_languages: category of factorial languages
   * .shifts: the category of shift
 * sage.categories: Most of the generic code is contained there.
   * .languages: A language is a subset of A^* where A is a set called alphabet. It is naturally graded by N and the grading is called the length.
   * .factorial_languages: category of factorial languages (= language stable under taking factors)
   * .shifts: the category of shift A^G where G is almost anything and A is a set called alphabet
Line 19: Line 29:
   * .free_monoid: the free monoid (replaces sage.combinat.words.words.Words)
   * .free_monoid_morphism (replaces sage.combinat.words.morphism.WordMorphism)
   * .free_monoid: the free monoid (replaces part of sage.combinat.words.words.Words)
   * .free_monoid_morphism: (replaces sage.combinat.words.morphism.WordMorphism)
Line 22: Line 32:
   * .full_shift: an implementation of the full shift (replaces sage.combinat.words.words.Words)    * .full_shift: an implementation of the full shift (replaces part of sage.combinat.words.words.Words)
Line 24: Line 34:
   * implementation of different languages    * implementation of different languages (balanced, language of a finite word, ...)
Line 71: Line 81:
which should go in the main trac ticket
 * words path (currently in sage.combinat.words.paths) which have to be modified to fit with the new implementation
for #12224:
 * update factorial langages, with doc and tests: task taken by ThierryMonteil
 * implement a simple example of factorial languages in sage.categories.example.factorial_languages.py : task taken by ThierryMonteil
 * think about naming convention. For example, to get the subset of words of length n of a language L, do you prefer L.subset(n=4) or L.subset(length=4)
 * be sure that the methods in sage.categories.languages.ElementMethods are as minimal as possible
 * words path (currently in sage.combinat.words.paths) which have to be modified to fit with the new implementation (question: should we do this right now ?)
 * backward compatibility with the previous implementation (in particular with respect to pickling)
 * make difference between finite/infinite/enumerated/ordered alphabet (in particular when the parents are initialized with a specific category)
Line 74: Line 90:
other todos for other tickets:

Languages and tilings

This page gathers ideas for refactorization of sage.combinat.words and implementation of tilings.

You can subscribe to the associated mailing-list to discuss about this.

How do I implement my language ? my tiling ?

There are different places to look at for examples:

  • sage.categories.examples.languages: two examples of languages. PalindromicLanguages (the language of palindromes) and UniformMonoid (the submonoid of the free monoid on {a,b} that contains as many a as b).

  • sage.categories.examples.factorial_languages: ??? (need an example)
  • sage.monoids.free_monoid: implementation of the free monoid.
  • sage.combinat.languages.*: where most implementation of languages should go.

For tilings, there is not yet examples.

Structure

The refactorization of the current code should go in the patch #12224 which is almost done. Up to now the code is a bit dissaminated everywhere in Sage:

  • sage.categories: Most of the generic code is contained there.
    • .languages: A language is a subset of A^* where A is a set called alphabet. It is naturally graded by N and the grading is called the length.
    • .factorial_languages: category of factorial languages (= language stable under taking factors)
    • .shifts: the category of shift A^G where G is almost anything and A is a set called alphabet
  • sage.combinat.words
    • data structure for finite and infinite words
  • sage.monoids
    • .free_monoid: the free monoid (replaces part of sage.combinat.words.words.Words)
    • .free_monoid_morphism: (replaces sage.combinat.words.morphism.WordMorphism)

  • sage.dynamics.symbolic
    • .full_shift: an implementation of the full shift (replaces part of sage.combinat.words.words.Words)
  • sage.combinat.languages
    • implementation of different languages (balanced, language of a finite word, ...)
    • specific data structure (suffix tree/trie, rauzy graph, return tree, ...)

What is bad/nice with categories:

  • inheritance of generic code
  • a bit confusing for the user who want to find the implementation of a method
  • confusing for the person who writes the code and ask "where should I put this ?"
  • ...

What do we keep? What categories do we create?

Behavior of algorithms with infinite input data

What to do for equality of infinite words ?

What should do

sage: w1 == w2

Two possibilities:

  1. test the first XXX letters for finding a difference. If find one then returns False otherwise raise an error, "seems to be equal use .is_equal(force=True) to launch the infinite test".
  2. test all letters and never return True

Other suggestions ?

Subprojects

Finite languages and factor set

Most of it was implemented by Franco (suffix tree and suffix trie). We would like to enhance it and make a specific data structure (called Rauzy castle) for FiniteFactorialLanguages. See #12225.

Substitutive and adic languages

There are many algorithms for languages described by a sequence of substitutions (called a directive word). The particular case of morphic and purely morphic languages correspond respectively to periodic and purely_periodic directive words.

  • Enumeration of factors, desubstitution (#12227)

  • Factor complexity for purely morphic languages (#12231)

  • Equality for purely morphic languages (following J. Honkala, CANT, chapter 10)

Eventually periodic languages / words

They will be useful to define eventually periodic directive words for adic languages. See #12228.

TODO list

for #12224:

  • update factorial langages, with doc and tests: task taken by ThierryMonteil

  • implement a simple example of factorial languages in sage.categories.example.factorial_languages.py : task taken by ThierryMonteil

  • think about naming convention. For example, to get the subset of words of length n of a language L, do you prefer L.subset(n=4) or L.subset(length=4)
  • be sure that the methods in sage.categories.languages.ElementMethods are as minimal as possible

  • words path (currently in sage.combinat.words.paths) which have to be modified to fit with the new implementation (question: should we do this right now ?)
  • backward compatibility with the previous implementation (in particular with respect to pickling)
  • make difference between finite/infinite/enumerated/ordered alphabet (in particular when the parents are initialized with a specific category)

for other tickets:

  • specific data structure rauzy graphs and return tree (Thierry)
  • 1-dim subshift of finite type / sofic
  • n-dim finite words and n-dimensional shifts
  • n-dim subshifts of finite type
  • n-dim substitutive subshift
  • cellular automata
  • ... add your whishes

LanguagesAndTilings (last edited 2014-03-19 13:30:06 by vdelecroix)