Differences between revisions 3 and 17 (spanning 14 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2009-03-26 03:06:38
Size: 6793
Editor: Minh Nguyen
Comment: Add tickets to include in release tour; these need to be summarized, but I'll get to that :-)
Revision 17 as of 2009-04-18 06:21:19
Size: 11743
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:

 * FIXME: summarize ticket #5658.
Line 42: Line 44:
Furthermore, on Debian 5.0 Lenny with the following system info:
 {{{
kernel: 2.6.24-1-686
CPU:
Intel(R) Celeron(R) 2.00GHz
RAM:
1.0GB
}}}
here are some timing statistics:
Furthermore, on Debian 5.0 Lenny with kernel 2.6.24-1-686, an Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU running at 2.00GHz with 1.0GB of RAM, one has the following timing statistics:
Line 83: Line 79:
 * FIXME: summarize #5629

Line 86: Line 85:
 * Speed-up in dividing a polynomial by an integer (Burcin Erocal) -- Dividing a polynomial by an integer is now up to 7x faster than previously. On the machine sage.math, one has the following timing statistics:  * Speed-up in dividing a polynomial by an integer (Burcin Erocal) -- Dividing a polynomial by an integer is now up to 6x faster than previously. On Debian 5.0 Lenny with kernel 2.6.24-1-686, an Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU running at 2.00GHz with 1.0GB of RAM, one has the following timing statistics:
Line 92: Line 91:
625 loops, best of 3: 231 µs per loop
625 loops, best of 3: 312 µs per loop
Line 99: Line 97:
625 loops, best of 3: 32.4 µs per loop
 }}}


 * FIXME: summarize #5093
625 loops, best of 3: 48.3 µs per loop
 }}}


 * New {{{fast_float}}} supports more datatypes with improved performance (Carl Witty) -- A rewrite of {{{fast_float}}} to support multiple types. Here, we get accelerated evaluation over {{{RealField(k)}}} as well as {{{RDF}}}, real double field. As compared with the previous {{{fast_float}}}, improved performance can range from 2% faster to more than 2x as fast. An extended list of benchmark details is available at [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5093|ticket 5093]].


 * FIXME: summarize #5622
Line 112: Line 113:
 * FIXME: summarize #5413  * Deprecate the calling of symbolic functions with unnamed arguments (Carl Witty, Michael Abshoff) -- Previous releases of Sage supported symbolic functions with "no arguments". This style of constructing symbolic functions is now deprecated. For example, previously Sage allowed for defining a symbolic function in the following way
 {{{
f2 = 5 - x^2 # bad; this is deprecated
 }}}
 But users are encouraged to explicitly declare the variables used in a symolic function. For instance, the following is encouraged:
 {{{
sage: x,y = var("x, y") # explicitly declare your variables
sage: f(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 # this syntax is encouraged
 }}}
Line 122: Line 131:
 * FIXME: summarize #5200  * Enhancements to the {{{Subsets}}} and {{{Subwords}}} modules (Florent Hivert) -- Numerous enhancements to the modules {{{Subsets}}} and {{{Subwords}}} include:
  1. An implementation of subsets for finite multisets, i.e. sets with repetitions.
  1. Adding the method {{{__contains__}}} for {{{Subsets}}} and {{{Subwords}}}.
 Here's an example for working with multisets:
 {{{
sage: S = Subsets([1, 2, 2], submultiset=True); S
SubMultiset of [1, 2, 2]
sage: S.list()
[[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [2, 2], [1, 2, 2]]
sage: Set([1,2]) in S # this uses __contains__ in Subsets
True
sage: Set([]) in S
True
sage: Set([3]) in S
False
 }}}
 And here's an example of using {{{__contains__}}} with {{{Subwords}}}:
 {{{
sage: [] in Subwords([1,2,3,4,3,4,4])
True
sage: [2,3,3,4] in Subwords([1,2,3,4,3,4,4])
True
sage: [2,3,3,1] in Subwords([1,2,3,4,3,4,4])
False
 }}}


 * Fix and Enhancements to permutations (Sebastien Labbe) --
 Corrects the Robinson-Schensted algorithm on trivial permutations. Implements the inverse Robinson-Schensted algorithm:
 {{{
 sage: Permutation((Tableau([[1,2,4],[3]]), Tableau([[1,3,4],[2]])))
 [3, 1, 2, 4]
 sage: Permutation(([[1,2,4],[3]], [[1,3,4],[2]]))
 [3, 1, 2, 4]
 }}}
 It also works for arbitrary words (with semi-standard tableaux):
 {{{
 sage: Permutation(([[1,2,2],[3]], [[1,3,4],[2]]))
 [3, 1, 2, 2]
 }}}

 * First pass of cleanup of the interface of combinatorial classes -- Florent Hivert

 Before the patch the interface of combinatorial classes had two problems:

   - there were two redundant ways to get the number of elements {{{len(C)}}} and {{{C.count()}}}. Moreover {{{len}}} must return a plain {{{int}}} where we want arbitrary large number and even {{{infinity}}};

   - there were two redundant way to get an iterator for the elements {{{C.iterator()}}} and {{{iter(C)}}} (allowing for {{{for c in C: ...}}}) via {{{C.__iter__}}}.
 
 The patch standardize those to:

   - {{{C.cardinality()}}} which is more explicit and consistent with many other Sage libraries;

   - {{{iter(C)}}} / {{{for x in C:}}} via {{{C.__iter__}}} with is clearly more Pythonic.
 
  The functions {{{ iterator}}} and {{{count}}} are deprecated (with a warning) but still working for the moment (please fix your code). On the other hand, there was no way to keep backward compatibility for {{{len}}}. Indeed, many of function such as {{{list / filter / map}}} try silently to call {{{len}}}, which would have caused miriads of warnings to be issued in seemingly unrelated places. So it was decided to simply remove it, and issue an error, suggesting to call {{{cardinality}}} instead.

 * FIXME: summarize #4549
Line 154: Line 220:
 * FIXME: summarize #5318

Line 159: Line 228:
 * Improved enumeration of vertices and 0-dimensional faces of LatticePolytope's. There was an inconsistency between indicies of vertices, i.e. columns of the .vertices() matrix, and indicies of 0-dimensional faces, i.e. objects returned by .faces(dim=0). E.g. the 5-th 0-dimensional face could be generated by the 7-th vertex etc. Now the i-th 0-dimensional face is generated by the i-th vertex. (The reason for the old behaviour was the output of the underlying software package PALP, now there is extra sorting.)
Line 161: Line 231:


 * FIXME: summarize #5623
Line 204: Line 277:
 * Speed-up in calculating determinants of matrices (John H. Palmieri, William Stein) -- For matrices over {{{Z/nZ}}} with {{{n}}} composite, calculating their determinants is now up to 1.5% faster. On the machine sage.math, one can see the following improvement in computation time:
 {{{
# BEFORE
sage: mat = random_matrix(Integers(256), 30)
sage: timeit("Integers(256)(mat.lift().det())")
25 loops, best of 3: 9.53 ms per loop
sage:
sage: mat = random_matrix(Integers(256), 200)
sage: timeit("Integers(256)(mat.lift().det())")
5 loops, best of 3: 779 ms per loop
sage:
sage: mat = random_matrix(Integers(2^20), 500)
sage: timeit("Integers(256)(mat.lift().det())")
5 loops, best of 3: 13.5 s per loop


# AFTER
sage: mat = random_matrix(Integers(256), 30)
sage: timeit("Integers(256)(mat.lift().det())")
25 loops, best of 3: 10 ms per loop
sage:
sage: mat = random_matrix(Integers(256), 200)
sage: timeit("Integers(256)(mat.lift().det())")
5 loops, best of 3: 762 ms per loop
sage:
sage: mat = random_matrix(Integers(2^20), 500)
sage: timeit("Integers(256)(mat.lift().det())")
5 loops, best of 3: 13.3 s per loop
 * Speed-up in calculating determinants of matrices (John H. Palmieri, William Stein) -- For matrices over {{{Z/nZ}}} with {{{n}}} composite, calculating their determinants is now up to 1500x faster. On Debian 5.0 Lenny with kernel 2.6.24-1-686, an Intel(R) Celeron(R) 2.00GHz CPU with 1.0GB of RAM, one has the following timing statistics:
 {{{
# BEFORE
sage: time random_matrix(Integers(26), 10).determinant()
CPU times: user 15.52 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 15.54 s
Wall time: 15.54 s
13
sage: time random_matrix(Integers(256), 10).determinant()
CPU times: user 15.38 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 15.38 s
Wall time: 15.38 s
144


# AFTER
sage: time random_matrix(Integers(26), 10).determinant()
CPU times: user 0.01 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.01 s
Wall time: 0.01 s
23
sage: time random_matrix(Integers(256), 10).determinant()
CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
Wall time: 0.00 s
Line 238: Line 304:
 * FIXME: summarize #5638

Line 241: Line 310:
 * FIXME: summarize #5520

 * FIXME: summarize #5648

 * FIXME: summarize #5180

Line 244: Line 320:
FIXME: A number of tickets related to UTF-8 text got merged and should definitely be mentioned! #4547, #5211; #2896 and #1477 got fixed by those tickets. There's also #5564, which may not get merged for 3.4.1 but should get in soon; it pulls together a whole bunch of UTF-8 fixes and improvements.


 * FIXME: summarize #5681

Line 251: Line 333:
 * FIXME: summarize #793

 * FIXME: summarize #4667

 * FIXME: summarize #5159

 * FIXME: summarize #4990
Line 255: Line 345:
== Optional Packages ==

Line 263: Line 350:
 * FIXME: summarize #4881

 * FIXME: summarize #4880

 * FIXME: summarize #4876

 * FIXME: summarize #5672

 * FIXME: summarize #5240

Sage 3.4.1 Release Tour

Sage 3.4.1 was released on FIXME. For the official, comprehensive release note, please refer to sage-3.4.1.txt. A nicely formatted version of this release tour can be found at FIXME. The following points are some of the foci of this release:

  • Merging improvements during the Sage Days 13 coding sprint.
  • Other bug fixes post Sage 3.4.

Algebra

  • FIXME: summarize ticket #5535.
  • FIXME: summarize ticket #5658.
  • Speed-up in irreducibility test (Ryan Hinton) -- For polynomials over the finite field GF(2), the test for irreducibility is now up to 40,000 times faster than previously. On a 64-bit Debian/squeeze machine with Core 2 Duo running at 2.33 GHz, one has the following timing improvements:

    # BEFORE
    sage: P.<x> = GF(2)[]
    sage: f = P.random_element(1000)
    sage: %timeit f.is_irreducible()
    10 loops, best of 3: 948 ms per loop
    sage:
    sage: f = P.random_element(10000)
    sage: %time f.is_irreducible()
    # gave up because it took minutes!
    
    
    # AFTER
    sage: P.<x> = GF(2)[]
    sage: f = P.random_element(1000)
    sage: %timeit f.is_irreducible()
    10000 loops, best of 3: 22.7 µs per loop
    sage:
    sage: f = P.random_element(10000)
    sage: %timeit f.is_irreducible()
    1000 loops, best of 3: 394 µs per loop
    sage:
    sage: f = P.random_element(100000)
    sage: %timeit f.is_irreducible()
    100 loops, best of 3: 10.4 ms per loop

Furthermore, on Debian 5.0 Lenny with kernel 2.6.24-1-686, an Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU running at 2.00GHz with 1.0GB of RAM, one has the following timing statistics:

  • # BEFORE
    sage: P.<x> = GF(2)[]
    sage: f = P.random_element(1000)
    sage: %timeit f.is_irreducible()
    10 loops, best of 3: 1.14 s per loop
    sage: 
    sage: f = P.random_element(10000)
    sage: %time f.is_irreducible()
    CPU times: user 4972.13 s, sys: 2.83 s, total: 4974.95 s
    Wall time: 5043.02 s
    False
    
    
    # AFTER
    sage: P.<x> = GF(2)[]
    sage: f = P.random_element(1000)
    sage: %timeit f.is_irreducible()
    10000 loops, best of 3: 40.7 µs per loop
    sage: 
    sage: f = P.random_element(10000)
    sage: %timeit f.is_irreducible()
    1000 loops, best of 3: 930 µs per loop
    sage: 
    sage: 
    sage: f = P.random_element(100000)
    sage: %timeit f.is_irreducible()
    10 loops, best of 3: 27.6 ms per loop

Algebraic Geometry

  • FIXME: summarize #5629

Basic Arithmetic

  • Speed-up in dividing a polynomial by an integer (Burcin Erocal) -- Dividing a polynomial by an integer is now up to 6x faster than previously. On Debian 5.0 Lenny with kernel 2.6.24-1-686, an Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU running at 2.00GHz with 1.0GB of RAM, one has the following timing statistics:
    # BEFORE
    sage: R.<x> = ZZ["x"]
    sage: f = 389 * R.random_element(1000)
    sage: timeit("f//389")
    625 loops, best of 3: 312 µs per loop
    
    # AFTER
    sage: R.<x> = ZZ["x"]
    sage: f = 389 * R.random_element(1000)
    sage: timeit("f//389")
    625 loops, best of 3: 48.3 µs per loop
  • New fast_float supports more datatypes with improved performance (Carl Witty) -- A rewrite of fast_float to support multiple types. Here, we get accelerated evaluation over RealField(k) as well as RDF, real double field. As compared with the previous fast_float, improved performance can range from 2% faster to more than 2x as fast. An extended list of benchmark details is available at ticket 5093.

  • FIXME: summarize #5622

Build

Calculus

  • Deprecate the calling of symbolic functions with unnamed arguments (Carl Witty, Michael Abshoff) -- Previous releases of Sage supported symbolic functions with "no arguments". This style of constructing symbolic functions is now deprecated. For example, previously Sage allowed for defining a symbolic function in the following way
    f2 = 5 - x^2  # bad; this is deprecated
    But users are encouraged to explicitly declare the variables used in a symolic function. For instance, the following is encouraged:
    sage: x,y = var("x, y")    # explicitly declare your variables
    sage: f(x, y) = x^2 + y^2  # this syntax is encouraged

Coercion

Combinatorics

  • Enhancements to the Subsets and Subwords modules (Florent Hivert) -- Numerous enhancements to the modules Subsets and Subwords include:

    1. An implementation of subsets for finite multisets, i.e. sets with repetitions.
    2. Adding the method __contains__ for Subsets and Subwords.

    Here's an example for working with multisets:
    sage: S = Subsets([1, 2, 2], submultiset=True); S
    SubMultiset of [1, 2, 2]
    sage: S.list()
    [[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [2, 2], [1, 2, 2]]
    sage: Set([1,2]) in S  # this uses __contains__ in Subsets
    True
    sage: Set([]) in S
    True
    sage: Set([3]) in S
    False

    And here's an example of using __contains__ with Subwords:

    sage: [] in Subwords([1,2,3,4,3,4,4])
    True
    sage: [2,3,3,4] in Subwords([1,2,3,4,3,4,4])
    True
    sage: [2,3,3,1] in Subwords([1,2,3,4,3,4,4])
    False
  • Fix and Enhancements to permutations (Sebastien Labbe) -- Corrects the Robinson-Schensted algorithm on trivial permutations. Implements the inverse Robinson-Schensted algorithm:
     sage: Permutation((Tableau([[1,2,4],[3]]), Tableau([[1,3,4],[2]])))
     [3, 1, 2, 4]
     sage: Permutation(([[1,2,4],[3]], [[1,3,4],[2]]))
     [3, 1, 2, 4]
    It also works for arbitrary words (with semi-standard tableaux):
     sage: Permutation(([[1,2,2],[3]], [[1,3,4],[2]]))
     [3, 1, 2, 2]
  • First pass of cleanup of the interface of combinatorial classes -- Florent Hivert Before the patch the interface of combinatorial classes had two problems:
    • - there were two redundant ways to get the number of elements len(C) and C.count(). Moreover len must return a plain int where we want arbitrary large number and even infinity;

      - there were two redundant way to get an iterator for the elements C.iterator() and iter(C) (allowing for for c in C: ...) via C.__iter__.

    The patch standardize those to:
    • - C.cardinality() which is more explicit and consistent with many other Sage libraries;

      - iter(C) / for x in C: via C.__iter__ with is clearly more Pythonic.

    • The functions  iterator and count are deprecated (with a warning) but still working for the moment (please fix your code). On the other hand, there was no way to keep backward compatibility for len. Indeed, many of function such as list / filter / map try silently to call len, which would have caused miriads of warnings to be issued in seemingly unrelated places. So it was decided to simply remove it, and issue an error, suggesting to call cardinality instead.

  • FIXME: summarize #4549

Commutative Algebra

  • New function weil_restriction() on multivariate ideals (Martin Albrecht) -- The new function weil_restriction() computes the Weil restriction of a multivariate ideal over some extension field. A Weil restriction is also known as a restriction of scalars. Here's an example on computing a Weil restriction:

    sage: k.<a> = GF(2^2) 
    sage: P.<x,y> = PolynomialRing(k, 2)
    sage: I = Ideal([x*y + 1, a*x + 1])
    sage: I.variety() 
    [{y: a, x: a + 1}] 
    sage: J = I.weil_restriction() 
    sage: J 
    Ideal (x1*y0 + x0*y1 + x1*y1, x0*y0 + x1*y1 + 1, x0 + x1, x1 + 1) of 
    Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x0, x1, y0, y1 over Finite Field of size 2
  • FIXME: summarize #5146
  • FIXME: summarize #5353

Distribution

Doctest

  • FIXME: summarize #5318

Documentation

Geometry

  • Improved enumeration of vertices and 0-dimensional faces of LatticePolytope's. There was an inconsistency between indicies of vertices, i.e. columns of the .vertices() matrix, and indicies of 0-dimensional faces, i.e. objects returned by .faces(dim=0). E.g. the 5-th 0-dimensional face could be generated by the 7-th vertex etc. Now the i-th 0-dimensional face is generated by the i-th vertex. (The reason for the old behaviour was the output of the underlying software package PALP, now there is extra sorting.)

Graph Theory

  • FIXME: summarize #5623

Graphics

Group Theory

  • Speed-up in comparing elements of a permutation group (Robert Bradshaw, John H. Palmieri, Rob Beezer) -- For elements of a permutation group, comparison between those elements is now up to 13x faster. On Mac OS X 10.4 with Intel Core 2 duo running at 2.33 GHz, one has the following improvement in timing statistics:
    # BEFORE
    sage: a = SymmetricGroup(20).random_element()
    sage: b = SymmetricGroup(10).random_element()
    sage: timeit("a == b")
    625 loops, best of 3: 3.19 µs per loop
    
    
    # AFTER
    sage: a = SymmetricGroup(20).random_element()
    sage: b = SymmetricGroup(10).random_element()
    sage: time v = [a == b for _ in xrange(2000)]
    CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
    Wall time: 0.00 s
    sage: timeit("a == b")
    625 loops, best of 3: 240 ns per loop

Interfaces

Linear Algebra

  • Deprecate the function invert() (John H. Palmieri) -- The function invert() for calculating the inverse of a dense matrix with rational entries is now deprecated. Instead, users are now advised to use the function inverse(). Here's an example of using the function inverse():

    sage: a = matrix(QQ, 2, [1, 5, 17, 3])
    sage: a.inverse()  
    [-3/82  5/82] 
    [17/82 -1/82] 
  • Speed-up in calculating determinants of matrices (John H. Palmieri, William Stein) -- For matrices over Z/nZ with n composite, calculating their determinants is now up to 1500x faster. On Debian 5.0 Lenny with kernel 2.6.24-1-686, an Intel(R) Celeron(R) 2.00GHz CPU with 1.0GB of RAM, one has the following timing statistics:

    # BEFORE
    sage: time random_matrix(Integers(26), 10).determinant()
    CPU times: user 15.52 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 15.54 s
    Wall time: 15.54 s
    13
    sage: time random_matrix(Integers(256), 10).determinant()
    CPU times: user 15.38 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 15.38 s
    Wall time: 15.38 s
    144
    
    
    # AFTER
    sage: time random_matrix(Integers(26), 10).determinant()
    CPU times: user 0.01 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.01 s
    Wall time: 0.01 s
    23
    sage: time random_matrix(Integers(256), 10).determinant()
    CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
    Wall time: 0.00 s

Miscellaneous

  • FIXME: summarize #5638

Modular Forms

  • FIXME: summarize #5520
  • FIXME: summarize #5648
  • FIXME: summarize #5180

Notebook

FIXME: A number of tickets related to UTF-8 text got merged and should definitely be mentioned! #4547, #5211; #2896 and #1477 got fixed by those tickets. There's also #5564, which may not get merged for 3.4.1 but should get in soon; it pulls together a whole bunch of UTF-8 fixes and improvements.

  • FIXME: summarize #5681

Number Theory

  • FIXME: summarize #5518
  • FIXME: summarize #5508
  • FIXME: summarize #793
  • FIXME: summarize #4667
  • FIXME: summarize #5159
  • FIXME: summarize #4990

Numerical

Packages

  • FIXME: summarize #4987
  • FIXME: summarize #4881
  • FIXME: summarize #4880
  • FIXME: summarize #4876
  • FIXME: summarize #5672
  • FIXME: summarize #5240

Quadratic Forms

Symbolics

User Interface

Website / Wiki