|
Size: 2770
Comment:
|
Size: 1615
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 4: | Line 4: |
| *[[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7926|#7926: Bring coverage of Monsky-Washnitzer up to 50%]] *[[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8241|#8241: p-adic fields should have Witt Frobenius]] *[[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8685|#8685: evaluation of Monsky-Washnitzer objects (really about power series over p-adics)]] *[[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9887|#9887: Slow coercion from integer ring to integer mod ring]] *[[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11319|#11319: Cannot create homomorphism from prime residue field to finite field]] *[[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11777|#11777: Coercion/printing problem with p-adics]] * computing with chi_18 |
* [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7926|#7926: Bring coverage of Monsky-Washnitzer up to 50%]] * [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8241|#8241: p-adic fields should have Witt Frobenius]] * [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8685|#8685: evaluation of Monsky-Washnitzer objects (really about power series over p-adics)]] * [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9887|#9887: Slow coercion from integer ring to integer mod ring]] * [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11319|#11319: Cannot create homomorphism from prime residue field to finite field]] * [[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11777|#11777: Coercion/printing problem with p-adics]] |
| Line 14: | Line 12: |
* [[attachment:KateWishList.sws]] |
|
| Line 25: | Line 21: |
| * From William: For L-series lovers: Getting the doctest coverage to 100% on this might be a good project: |
* p-adic Project |
| Line 28: | Line 23: |
| http://code.google.com/p/purplesage/source/browse/psage/lseries/eulerprod.py | * Alice's Group [[http://wiki.sagemath.org/days33/alices]] |
| Line 30: | Line 25: |
| That may discover "issues" (bugs), which I would likely have to fix, but would also be fun because one gets to come up with lots of creative examples of L-series all over the place. Also, the top of that file has a todo list for new features to implement -- most would be bad projects, but one which would be good would be to make it so the Lseries object can use Lcalc (Rubinstein's program) to compute L-series instead of Dokchitser. This would be a good project, because it would mainly involve thinking about the annoying mathematics involved in going between normalizing L-series with the center of the critical strip at 1/2 versus not doing that. Also, it is all pure Python, so easier to get going. |
* Kate's Group [[http://wiki.sagemath.org/days33/kates]] |
| Line 42: | Line 27: |
| Anyway, I'd say 1 could be a good project for people who know the basics of L-series, but want to get a much more concrete feel for them. In fact, instead of just trying to get coverage to 100%, writing a *tutorial* for computing with L-series using that package would be really nice. E.g., one could walk through how to find missing information, create new L-series classes, etc. |
* L-function Project [[http://wiki.sagemath.org/days33/lfunction]] |
To do list
* p-adics
#8685: evaluation of Monsky-Washnitzer objects (really about power series over p-adics)
#11319: Cannot create homomorphism from prime residue field to finite field
* wrapping of gauss composition (in pari: QuadClassUnit)
* #11697: Global minimal models over number fields with class number >= 1
- this is in Connell and probably wouldn't take to long to get at least a python toy version
- Sage already has this for class number 1 fields
* Reviewing number theory and elliptic curve tickets
* p-adic Project
* Alice's Group http://wiki.sagemath.org/days33/alices
* Kate's Group http://wiki.sagemath.org/days33/kates
* L-function Project http://wiki.sagemath.org/days33/lfunction