Differences between revisions 190 and 206 (spanning 16 versions)
Revision 190 as of 2008-06-20 21:11:04
Size: 3871
Editor: robertwb
Comment:
Revision 206 as of 2008-07-02 09:05:21
Size: 4164
Editor: robertwb
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 46: Line 46:
 * groups
 * plot
 * structure
 * modules
 * coding
 * rings/number_field
 * rings/polynomial/laurent*
 * matrix
 * rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx
 * rings/natural.pyx
Line 48: Line 58:
 * rings/number_field (robertwb)
 * matrix (robertwb, matrix2.pyx -- one number field error)
 * schemes (ncalexan)
 * schemes (ncalexan, number field problems in elliptic_curves, padic problems in elliptic_curves, total mayhem in generic)
Line 52: Line 60:
 * modules (cwitty)
 * coding (cwitty)
Line 56: Line 62:

 * groups (generic.pyx due to elliptic curves over finite field problems)
 * invalid free in self_orthogonal_binary_codes
Line 59: Line 64:
 * modular
 * rings (residue_field.pyx)
   * many segfaults for mhansen, probably due to libsingular invalid read
 * rings/residue_field.pyx
 * [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3516 #3516] libSingular segfault related to the new coercion code [causes segfaults on startup on sage.math]
Line 62: Line 68:
 * plot (animate.py)
 * structure

Merge up at http://cython.org/coercion/hgwebdir.cgi/sage-coerce-3.0.3/ (pull on top of 3.0.3 release candidate) Should build and start without problems.

Hint: If something doesn't work, try typing

sage: coercion_traceback()

which will give a listing of all errors caught in the coercion model.

Doctests

Done

  • integer_mod
  • calculus
  • catalogue, dsage, media, stats, server, logic, tests, misc
  • probability
  • monoids
  • games
  • algebras
  • libs
  • lfunctions
  • quadratic forms
  • databases
  • sets
  • rings/rational
  • rings/real_lazy
  • finite fields
  • structure/formal_sums
  • rings/padics
  • graphs
  • ext
  • functions
  • complex, real
  • numerical
  • crypto
  • interfaces
  • qqbar
  • combinat
  • gsl
  • abelian_grps
  • geometry
  • groups
  • plot
  • structure
  • modules
  • coding
  • rings/number_field
  • rings/polynomial/laurent*
  • matrix
  • rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx
  • rings/natural.pyx

In Progress

  • schemes (ncalexan, number field problems in elliptic_curves, padic problems in elliptic_curves, total mayhem in generic)
  • modular (craigcitro)

To Do

  • invalid free in self_orthogonal_binary_codes
  • rings/polynomial
    • many segfaults for mhansen, probably due to libsingular invalid read
  • rings/residue_field.pyx
  • [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3516 #3516] libSingular segfault related to the new coercion code [causes segfaults on startup on sage.math]

  • categories (category_types.py -- 1 failure due to Spec in schemes)

This should fail: 
            sage: x, y = var('x,y')
            sage: parent(ZZ[x][y](1)*vector(QQ[y],[1,2]))
            sage: parent(ZZ[x](1)*vector(QQ[y],[1,2]))

Files to fix (Make all parents conform to the spec)

Useful script to list all parents in a given module that still need work: [attachment:list_parents.sage]

Nothing to do

  • catalogue, dsage, databases, ext, games, media, stats, server, plot, logic, tests lfunctions, misc, numerical,gsl, quadratic_forms

Done

In progress

  • groups
  • modular

Little to do

  • categories

Lots to do

Base classes

  • structure

Coercion doctesting

Comment from William:

teragon:sage was$ sage -coverage categories/action.pyx
structure/element.pyx structure/coerce.pyx |grep SCORE
SCORE categories/action.pyx: 0% (0 of 22)
SCORE structure/element.pyx: 18% (28 of 153)
SCORE structure/coerce.pyx: 2% (1 of 39)

I tried to understand and use the coercion model code to trac down the issue with #2079 and
was amazed at how nonexistent the doctesting and documentation of
functions is there.
In order for people to write lots of coercion code all of Sage, it's critical that they can
read the coercion model code so they can track down -- for themselves -- what is going
wrong when they run into trouble.  I would put getting the coverage of the above files
(and whatever else is related to coercion) up to 100% as the first step in your coercion
model stuff.   Seriously.   And don't say it can't be doctested, since even though there are
a lot of things not easily accessible now from the interpreter, such as the coercion model

Categories to implement

Old notes

To start, get a copy of Sage 2.10.1, install the latest cython spkg (available at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/cython/), pull from http://cython.org/coercion/hgwebdir.cgi/sage-coerce/ and build.

Import [attachment:fix-random.patch] to sage-scripts to ignore random tests.

days7/coercion/todo (last edited 2009-07-29 19:16:15 by robertwb)