|
Size: 574
Comment:
|
Size: 2099
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| === Files to fix === | === Files to fix (Make all parents conform to the spec) === |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| * catalogue * coding * functions * lfunctions * logic * plot * server * stats * tests |
Useful script to list all parents in a given module that still need work: [attachment:list_parents.sage] |
| Line 13: | Line 5: |
| * databases * dsage * ext * games * media |
Nothing to do * catalogue, dsage, databases, ext, games, media, stats, server, plot, logic, tests lfunctions, misc, numerical,gsl, quadratic_forms Done * coding, functions, graphs * matrix [http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/coerce/coerce-all.hg] * complex, real [http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/coerce/coerce-real-complex.hg] * modules [attachment:coerce-free-module.patch] * quotient rings * finite fields (including natural embeddings into each other when Conway polynomials are used) * calculus * number fields * sets * geometry * libs * probability In progress * groups Little to do |
| Line 20: | Line 29: |
| * calculus | |
| Line 24: | Line 32: |
| * geometry | |
| Line 26: | Line 33: |
| * graphs * groups * gsl |
Lots to do |
| Line 30: | Line 36: |
| * libs * matrix * misc |
|
| Line 34: | Line 37: |
| * modules | |
| Line 36: | Line 38: |
| * numerical * probability * quadratic_forms |
|
| Line 40: | Line 39: |
| * sets | |
| Line 43: | Line 41: |
| * complex * real |
|
| Line 46: | Line 42: |
| * padic | * padics |
| Line 49: | Line 45: |
| Base classes | |
| Line 52: | Line 48: |
| === Coercion doctesting === Comment from William: {{{ teragon:sage was$ sage -coverage categories/action.pyx structure/element.pyx structure/coerce.pyx |grep SCORE SCORE categories/action.pyx: 0% (0 of 22) SCORE structure/element.pyx: 18% (28 of 153) SCORE structure/coerce.pyx: 2% (1 of 39) I tried to understand and use the coercion model code to trac down the issue with #2079 and was amazed at how nonexistent the doctesting and documentation of functions is there. In order for people to write lots of coercion code all of Sage, it's critical that they can read the coercion model code so they can track down -- for themselves -- what is going wrong when they run into trouble. I would put getting the coverage of the above files (and whatever else is related to coercion) up to 100% as the first step in your coercion model stuff. Seriously. And don't say it can't be doctested, since even though there are a lot of things not easily accessible now from the interpreter, such as the coercion model }}} |
Files to fix (Make all parents conform to the spec)
Useful script to list all parents in a given module that still need work: [attachment:list_parents.sage]
Nothing to do
- catalogue, dsage, databases, ext, games, media, stats, server, plot, logic, tests lfunctions, misc, numerical,gsl, quadratic_forms
Done
- coding, functions, graphs
matrix [http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/coerce/coerce-all.hg]
complex, real [http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/coerce/coerce-real-complex.hg]
- modules [attachment:coerce-free-module.patch]
- quotient rings
- finite fields (including natural embeddings into each other when Conway polynomials are used)
- calculus
- number fields
- sets
- geometry
- libs
- probability
In progress
- groups
Little to do
- algebras
- categories
- combinat
- crypto
Lots to do
- interfaces
- modular
- monoids
- schemes
- rings
- polynomial
- padics
- other
Base classes
- structure
Coercion doctesting
Comment from William:
teragon:sage was$ sage -coverage categories/action.pyx structure/element.pyx structure/coerce.pyx |grep SCORE SCORE categories/action.pyx: 0% (0 of 22) SCORE structure/element.pyx: 18% (28 of 153) SCORE structure/coerce.pyx: 2% (1 of 39) I tried to understand and use the coercion model code to trac down the issue with #2079 and was amazed at how nonexistent the doctesting and documentation of functions is there. In order for people to write lots of coercion code all of Sage, it's critical that they can read the coercion model code so they can track down -- for themselves -- what is going wrong when they run into trouble. I would put getting the coverage of the above files (and whatever else is related to coercion) up to 100% as the first step in your coercion model stuff. Seriously. And don't say it can't be doctested, since even though there are a lot of things not easily accessible now from the interpreter, such as the coercion model